Tag: cervical radiculopathy

Feelings…about back pain

Feelings…Nothing more than, feelings

 

This weeks article speaks to the importance of choosing your provider. Writings may be few and far between, as I am getting married the afternoon of this writing. Because we will be taking our honeymoon soon, there will be a pause in publishing more articles. FEAR NOT! I will return.  Thanks for reading

 

  1. non-specific “LBP (low back pain) where it is not possible to diagnose a specific cause”

 

This accounts for about 90% of back pain issues as stated in previous research. When a doctor tells you “you have a herniated disc”, “you have arthritis”, “you have spondylolisthesis” (sorry, I wanted to sound smart), they are simply telling you what another doctor saw on an image. What does this mean? It means that you have lived a life on this Earth and are no different than a majority of the population…okay the spondylolisthesis is not that common. Aside from telling you that you are normal compared to most people, they are telling you that your picture on an image (x-ray, MRI, CT scan) is not the ideal that is in the textbooks. The picture alone can not tell you with certainty that this is what is causing your pain. In other words, your pain is not specifically coming from anywhere, but it may be coming from any structure that senses pain and refers pain to that area.

 

Think of a heart attack. I picture George Costanza (Cant standja) from Seinfield. His imagined heart attack was complete with left arm pain and chest tightness. This is what we mean by referred. The heart, when upset, can send pain signals to other portions of the body…even though there is nothing wrong with the left arm or jaw or any other location that the heart tells the brain.

 

  1. “…experts have questioned whether the current paradigm is flawed”

 

We are right about what structure is causing your pain in about 10% of the cases..do you think that there is a flaw in the system somewhere? The first flaw is that the structure causing the pain actually matters. I know…I know, you want to know why you feel a knife slicing your spine in half or ants crawling on your skin, but in the end, if we turn off the pain…Does it matter?

I think the primary flaw is trying turn non-specific low back pain into something specific. There is plenty of research that demonstrates this: once you have an “answer” to the cause of your pain, you are quite willing to start blaming all of your problems on your disc or stenosis or arthritis or spondylolisthesis. “Sorry honey, can’t do the dishes…my disc bulge is acting up.” Actually…I may need to use this later. I RECANT ALL I JUST SAID. Joking of course…don’t take anything I write seriously.

 

  1. “Guidelines for the rehabilitation of patients with persistent NSLBP (that non-specific low back pain thingy from above) highlight the importance of practitioners encouraging patients to remain at work and stay as active as possible, with a key focus on self-managing their condition”

 

I of course will tell you that back pain will not kill you. It could in a very small percentage of the population be something so serious that it will kill you, but in reality it’s probably not you. (again, I am not a medical doctor, but a doctor of physical therapy, so if you think your back pain will kill you…go see your medical doctor). I can understand that some people just want a break from work. If this gives you good reason to take a break from work…Shhh…I won’t tell. Aside from the mental health days that you may want to take, don’t let back pain keep you from working. You are highly unlikely to make it any worse, or better for that manner, by working. Back pains due to disc herniations (bulges) are not the result of one massive injury, but the result of multiple small injuries over time. It’s like the old saying, “the straw that broke the camel’s back” (HAHAHA…it literally fits).

 

  1. “It is not known why physical therapists do not follow guideline advice”

 

This is my complete opinion here, but the patient’s don’t know any better. If the patient’s can’t tell the difference between good therapy and bad therapy, and if we then let the cat out of the bag and say that bad therapy pays more than good therapy, why don’t YOU think that the guidelines aren’t followed? There are some therapists that know the guidelines like the back of there hands, such as myself. You can see a previous blog in which I summarize the guidelines for low back pain, but there are other therapists altogether that don’t know that these guidelines don’t exist. I make this statement in a general sense and I extrapolate it from previous research that states that older therapists don’t have either the time or expertise to find a research article. If they can’t find it, then like the tree in the forest…it didn’t happen.

On an aside, I have to keep touching on the bad therapy pays more than good therapy situation. Our profession has historically been paid for what we do to you. Meaning if we give you an ultrasound…cha ching$$$. If we give you e-stim…cha ching$$$. If we give you a rub down…cha ching$$$. If we have you do exercise (whether we are watching you [the ethical thing] or a high school graduate aide is watching you [the pay is the same]…cha ching$$$. If we do all of the above and add traction…$$$. You get the point. We are finally starting to move to a system that if you have a knee replacement, then we will get paid a specific amount, regardless of what we do to you in that process. You will slowly start seeing all of the above disappearing over time because the effect is questionable and we would then be getting paid less per treatment approach that we use. ITS ALL ABOUT THE BENJAMINS BABY!

 

  1. “Practitioners’ attitudes and beliefs about LBP have been shown to influence their advice and treatment recommendations”

 

What this tells me is that we are treating based on tradition instead of the current evidence. Again, if you go to multiple doctors, you will get multiple opinions. The same thing holds true for PT’s. If you see a myofascial specialist…then you have a myofascial problem. If you see a manipulator…then you have a facet (back joint problem). If you see a MDT specialist…then you have a disc problem. We as practitioners have to know more than one system, but we better be good using at least one of the systems; otherwise we will just start mixing and matching systems.

 

  1. “Results have shown that practitioners’ professional group and practice setting appear to be associated with their attitudes, beliefs, and advice”

 

$$$$$$$$$!

If the practice setting values money over results, then the people working in that setting will have to reflect the values of their employers. It’s rough out there in this profession because it is hard to figure out which employer you are walking into until it is too late. There is such a huge pressure financially to make a living and pay off the hundreds of thousands in student loan debt, that the new graduate doesn’t know the difference between an awesome environment and one of financial manipulation.

 

  1. “ I would probably explain to her that it was most likely postural strain…there could be an underlying facet joint degenerative problem evident”

 

How confident are you in this practitioner’s opinion of your problem. It could be this or it could be that? I don’t really have a good reason for either, but “Hey, it’s usually this or that…so why not now?”

 

  1. “They believed that patients who exercises and kept active were more likely to avoid future episodes of NSLBP”

 

For future reference, please read Audrey Long’s article about the right exercise.

What if I told you that your therapist could be making you worse? If we don’t keep up with the research…it is possible. Not all exercise is good exercise. More on this in another blog.

 

  1. “Empowerment through education and pain control were clear subthemes…”

 

People…IT’S YOUR BODY! TAKE CONTROL. We can hold your hand, coach you, be compassionate towards you, but WE CAN NOT FIX YOU! You have to play a role. We can give you the tools to fix yourself, but if you don’t use the tools then WE failed TOGETHER. I didn’t fail, you didn’t fail…BUT WE FAILED!

 

  1. “’passive attitudes’…Therapists found working with these patients demanding, as from their perspective, patients with these attitudes were difficult to communicate with and, therefore difficult to educate and empower”

 

Please see # 9.

 

Excerpts taken from:

Jeffrey JE. Foster NE. A Qualitative Investigation of Physical Therapists’ Experiences and Feelings of Managing Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Phys her. 2012;92:266-278.

 

As an aside, I just saw that Nadine Foster is one of the authors. I absolutely adore this lady. I had to opportunity to hear her talk at the MDT conference in Austin. I really adore smart people, and she was impressive.

 

Paint by number

I recently finished my transitional Doctorate of Physical Therapy degree.  There was long hours involved and lucky for you, I saved all (well…maybe most) of my work.  Here is an oldie, but a goodie (voice of Kasey Kasem)

 

A Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain (LBP)

 

P: For patients with back and/or leg pain

I: what is the level of evidence regarding varying interventions, outcome measures, risk factors, and assessment processes

C: throughout the profession of physical therapy

O: that can be used in the course of care of individual patients

 

Reviewer:

Vincent Gutierrez, PT, MPT, cert. MDT

 

Search:

Ovidsp with title terms “low back pain” and “guidelines” with keyword of “physical therapy”. The results were limited to articles published in the previous two years.   Seven citations were found.

 

Date of Search: March 1, 2014

 

Citation:

Delitto A, George S, Van Dillen L, et al. Low Back Pain: Clinical Practice Guidelines Linded to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. JOSPT 2012;42(4):A1-A57.

 

Summary:

 

The purpose of this guideline is to provide physical therapists with information, based on strength of the current evidence, regarding risk factors, clinical course, diagnosis/classification, differential diagnosis, examination, and interventions in the treatment of low back pain, with or without leg symptoms.

 

Content experts, appointed by the Orthpaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), researched the above information. The authors independently searched the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to initially acquire the content matter. The articles were limited to articles published prior to 2011 and the authors searched the reference list of each article in order to prevent the omission of a relevant article. The articles were leveled according to the criteria from the Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and were then were issued a grade of recommendation as previously described in the research.

 

The authors provided a comprehensive list of both International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) Codes 10 and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) codes.

 

The authors determined that based on lesser quality studies that data does not support a cause of LBP and risk factors are weakly associated with LBP.

 

Based on lesser quality studies, the data supports performing interventions that reduce the likelihood of transitioning from acute to chronic LBP and reducing the likelihood of recurrences.

 

Based on evidence from high quality studies, it is recommended to sub-classify patients based on signs and symptoms, such as the Treatment Based Classification System. Based on moderate evidence, the following signs and symptoms are useful in classifying patients based on the ICF and ICD-10: mobility impairment in the thoracic, lumbar or sacroiliac regions, referred or radiating pain into a lower extremity and generalize pain.

 

Based on evidence from high quality studies through expert opinion, it is recommended based on moderate evidence to consider performing a differential diagnosis to when serious medical conditions are suspected.

 

Based on high quality studies, there is strong evidence to recommend utilizing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI or the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in order to monitor change pre-post intervention.

 

Based solely on case control studies, it is recommended based on opinion that clinicians should assess activity participation limitations.

 

Based on multiple high quality studies and few case studies, the authors provide strong evidence for recommending manipulative therapy in the treatment of LBP. These recommendations are only provided for patients with symptoms above the knee.

 

Based on high quality studies, the authors recommend performing trunk coordination, strengthening and endurance exercises to reduce pain and disability with patients ranging from subacute to chronic and also patients status post microdiscectomy. This recommendation is based on strong evidence.

 

Based on both high quality studies and case control studies, the authors recommend utilizing repeated movements or procedures, in a specific direction, to promote centralization. This is based on strong evidence.

 

Based on lesser quality evidence and case controlled studies, the authors recommend flexion exercises, combined with other interventions, for reducing pain in older patients with chronic symptoms. This is based on weak evidence.

 

Based on lesser quality studies and case series, the authors recommend lower quarter nerve mobilization procedures to reduce pain in patients with subacute and chronic LBP, with lower extremity symptoms. This is based on weak evidence.

 

Based on research ranging from high quality studies to expert opinion, it is recommended that clinicians avoid educational techniques based on pathoanatomy and extended bed rest. Recommended advice is centered on the inherent strength of the spine, the neuroscience explaining pain, the overall favorable prognosis of LBP, the use of active (as compared to passive) coping mechanisms, and early return to activity. This is based on strong evidence.

 

Conclusion:

Based on the Clinical Practice Guidelines above, the following is recommended based on strong evidence: utilizing an outcome measure such as the ODI or RMDQ, manual therapy, trunk coordination, strengthening and endurance exercises, promoting centralization, and performing patient education.

If you have back and want to be seen by a therapist that reads research for fun, come see me at 

FUNCTIONAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION

now a part of the Goodlife family

903 N 129th Infantry Dr. 

suite 500

Joliet IL

8154832440 

 

 

I AM an N of one! (superman pose)

 

If I care more about you than you do…we got a problem. If you live with chronic pain, you may not have to. Seek out a qualified healthcare practitioner, versed in research, and participate in your own health care.

 

  1. “…researchers and clinicians have come to understand patients as a heterogeneous group…One of the first classification schemes was created by McKenzie.”

Not all patients with back pain have the same back pain from the same source. Meaning one patient may have pain from the disc, one may have pain from the spine joints, one may have pain from pressure on the posterior longitudinal ligament and one may have a muscle sprain/spasm. That last one gets used a lot, but I have yet to see a true muscle sprain/spasm in the clinic. The point of this is that we first have to classify a patient when they come into the clinic. Another phrase for classifying is to make a “best guess” as to what is causing the problem. I worked with a well-respected physiatrist Dr. Ron Mochizuki and while we were presenting at a community event he stated, “When we know what fixes your problem, then we will know what caused it.” After hearing this, it made a lot of sense. Unfortunately, everyone wants an answer to the “WHY do I have pain?” question, but the answer is not that easy.

Mckenzie…where do I start? Robin was innovative and passionate. This guy, dearly departed, imparted more influence into our profession than any other practitioner in the previous century! For all of the PT’s that may actually read this, think about this. Readers of the Journal of Sports Physical Therapy voted the likes of Sahrmann, Paris, Mulligan, McMillan, Kendall, Maitland, and Robin as the most influential PT of the previous century. Robin bucked the trend in therapy at the time and was seen a cult leader. We now know that he was well ahead of his time. He was our House MD, both revered for his knowledge and sometimes mocked for his lack of servitude to the traditional treatment paradigm.

 

  1. “Centralization has been consistently associated with a good prognosis for both pain and function, and can direct appropriate treatment”

Centralization (Look it up! It’s that important if you have back pain) trumps depression, trumps yellow flags (You’ll hear more about these later) and again is the “TRUMP CARD” as previously stated in the literature to treating back pain.

 

  1. “This case study describes the assessment and treatment of a patient with a 20-plus year history of constant low back and bilateral leg pain, presenting with multiple yellow flags and verbalized fear avoidance…seen for a total of five visits over seven weeks”

A case study is a study with an “n” of 1. This means that this describes one patient. The “n” of one concept is being touted as very relevant in the popular podcasts such as the Tim Ferriss Show, Barbell Shrugged, The Paleo Solution Podcast, etc. What does this mean? In science, a case study is relegated near the bottom of the Totam pole. Why? If something works for one patient…So What?! It was only one patient. We think that a study should help thousands of people before we can claim it as helpful. This is horrible to think. It reminds me of a good story and then a personal story.

 

http://avalouise.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Starfish-Story.jpg

 

The first time that I heard this story was while I was in PT school. There was a guy, I apologize for not remembering his name. We were at Rush Hospital in Chicago and there was a recipient of a double lung transplant telling this story. He is the “n” of 1 and the transplant saved his life. The point of this is that a case study can be just as important as the big time studies if the person in the study gets a life saving treatment or intervention. His story inspired me to be a bone marrow donor. One of the hardest decisions that I ever had to make… and forever I will be a bone marrow donor. Forever I will have to have every other year interviews in order to educate me of the possible side effects that weren’t known at the time of my donation. My life is forever changed, but I am just an “N” of 1.

Back to the story…the patient had a 20-year history of back and both leg pain, with yellow flags. Any therapist reading this knows that we do not like seeing this patient in the waiting room prior to day one. They typically color in the entire body when asked to fill out the body diagram. They tend to color outside the lines on the body diagram. Really!? We know you have pain. Coloring outside the lines gets our attention, but not in a good way. A person with a 20 year history of pain is no good. I’ve seen many a therapist throw up their hands saying, “What am I going to do with this guy?” Needless to say, it still is a business and these patients tend to get put on a “shake and bake” “one-size-fits-all” program. Now on top of that, add in yellow flags and this has the makings of a disaster. Dave Ramsey has a saying that some people have “Eyeore” as a spirit animal. This is a quick summation of yellow flags. 

 

  1. “Her score on the Modified Oswestry Low Back Disability Index was 56%”

This is a questionnaire that allows the patient to self describe how symptoms limit lifestyle. This score would correlate with severe disability.

 

  1. “Management following Initial Assessment: Self Management provided: repeated extension in lying; repeated extension in standing; slouch/overcorrect in sitting…educated about the excellent prognosis in the presence of centralization”

Remember what I said about the “Trump Card”? Even in someone that has experienced pain for > 20 years and shows up to the clinic looking like Eyeore, there is still hope! At least if the therapist is well versed in the research and doesn’t default to “shake and bake”.

Repeated extension in lying is similar to the cobra pose in Yoga. This exercise has been synonymous with McKenzie forever, but MDT is more than just this exercise. Postural correction? Wait…posture is important? For some people, changing postire can turn off pin and increase confidence. 

  1. Visit Two (one week later)…Pain has reduced from 4/10 to 3/10. “She reported a consistent decrease in pain with the performance of her exercise…posterior-anterior mobilization of the lumbar spine (was added this session)”.

Not a huge change in pain intensity from visits one to visit two, but there was a huge change in perception. Once a patient understands that he/she has the power to change the pain, it’s over. The patient has to see that cause and effect. I don’t care if the pain has been there for 1 day or 20 years. I never tire of seeing the patient’s face when they start seeing the same patterns that I see. I love the look when they realize that the pain was within their control. That is awesome! P-A mobilizations are when the therapist puts his/her hands on the patient’s back, while the patient is lying face down. The therapist applies a downward force and the patient typically says “Ah…that feels good”. This may be no good (more to come later).

 

  1. Visit three (one week later): “initiating treatment with sustained extension in lying…head of the bed elevated for five minutes…performed to accommodate the patient’s reports of wrist pain with repeated extension in lying…symptoms were fully centralized”

Story Time: This is the famous story regarding Mr. Smith. Take yourself back to the 1950’s. Non-conformists weren’t looked upon in high regards. Robin was a non-conformist. Everyone at that time believed that if you bent a person backwards you would sever a person’s spine and cut the nerve roots in half! Seriously?! This is how they thought back then. Enter Mr. Smith…from here I will say go out and buy Robin’s book “Against the Tide”. It’s a great story from a great clinician and I can’t do this story justice because it is not my story.

 

  1. “Visit Four: pain level of 1/10…primarily centralized to the low back…avoiding passive treatment is consistent with promoting patient independence…hurt vs harm”

This patient is much better than previous visits at this time. A patient with 20 years of pain is starting to see the value of mechanical care. It’s funny I recently had a student that came into the clinic and said “I don’t plan on being a MDT based therapists when I graduate”. After this student left, I don’t think that he will be able to see treating a patient in any other way, as the results can be rapid…even in patients with 20 years of pain.

Passive treatments are any treatments in which the patient is not actively participating. This is the “Shake and Bake” described earlier. Passive treatments are as follows: massage, ultrasound, electrical stimulation, moist heat and some would say manipulation. Believe it or not, that is a strong statement. There are many therapists that built their careers on using passive treatments. These treatments require very little thought and the business gets reimbursed well for using these types of treatments. Our professional organization, the APTA, has come out strongly against the use of passive treatments and McKenzie was very much against passive treatments, as they foster dependence on the therapist instead of the patient taking ownership of the problem. I do physical therapy. I have a doctorate of PT. I can explain all of the same benefits that our profession uses to sell the continued use of these and then I can tell you that this research is old and there is little current research to show the benefit of the above list. We all want to help patients, but there is a huge chasm between traditional physical therapy and current therapy based on research.

Hurt vs. harm: If you have ever worked out, you understand soreness. Some coaches may have explained this as are you hurting or are you injured? Harm is no good, but hurt is normal. I have a two year old daughter and I am constantly stepping on small toys. It hurts…bad sometimes actually, but it doesn’t harm me. When a patient does something out of the ordinary, they will feel things out of the ordinary. This is not always harmful, but if that feeling lingers for a period of time (20 minutes based on research), then the hurt pain becomes harm pain. Stay out of harms way, but seek pain. This is the only way to become bigger, stronger, faster and the bigger, stronger, faster person tends to have a better quality of life than that of the smaller, weaker, slower person.

 

  1. “Visit Five: (one month later)…denied pain…patient scored 2% on her Modified Oswestry Disability Index…no longer fearful”

Twenty years of pain…GONE! This is a frequent occurrence in the clinic, but the therapist has to be trained in treating this type of patient. This a change of 10% is considered significant on the Oswestry, and this patient’s change was 5x significance! Of value, the patient’s belief system changed and was no longer afraid of movement!

 

  1. “several yellow flags…depression…inability to describe any relieving postures or activities besides rest; self-limiting…external locus of control”

This is Eyeore. Depressed, never excited, wants to rest and relax and believes that this is the best for symptoms, and external locus of control. This is the woe is me patient. Everything is out of the patient’s control and the world is against the patient. Think of the old joke about the country song…My dog died, my wife left me and the truck broke down. Never mind you didn’t feed the dog, love your wife or put gas in the truck. IT’S NOT MY FAULT! This is external locus of control.

 

MORAL: Don’t be Eyeore. Take control of your health. Go out and get bigger, faster, stronger.

 

Functional Therapy and Rehabilitation

903 N 129th Infantry Dr

Joliet IL

815-483-2440

 

Excerpts taken from:

 

Sheets C. Resolution of a 20-year history of chronic low back and leg pain with direction-specific exercise and focused pain education. IJMDT. 2009;4(3):30-36.

Socialized what?!

 

We all have our own opinions regarding socialized medicine, but let’s just look at some of the research from countries that provide socialized medicine.  This article is based on the system in Australia.

 

  1. “…34-year old male referred by his GP (primary physician) to the orthopaedic outpatient department…carpal tunnel” The PT referred the patient back to the GP and “suggested that the GP organize nerve conduction studies to confirm carpal tunnel syndrome, before the patient would be offered an appointment with a surgeon…seeing a physiotherapist to help clarify the diagnosis and see if the symptoms would respond to conservative treatment”

This is a mouthful. Let’s start with some of the major differences between the Australian system and the US system. The PT is the gatekeeper to see the surgeon. The PT’s opinion or consultation was taken seriously and the patient was sent back to the primary physician to order the tests before seeing the surgeon. Keeping it simple. Therapists do therapy. Chiropractors do chiropractic. Surgeons do surgery. It is wasteful to send a patient to a surgeon if the patient does not need surgery. It is not efficient to send a patient to a surgeon to order more tests. Also, the PT would help to clarify the diagnosis. For a long time, therapists in this country have been treated like technicians, only capable of performing the treatments that the physicians deemed appropriate. This is simply not the case anymore. We are a doctoring profession. Not that this in and of itself places us on a pedestal, but some of us continue to expand our knowledge base and have become professionals at both movement and classification of patients. This is to be respected, sought after and rewarded…not necessarily monetarily, but at least with more opportunities to demonstrate our abilities.

 

  1. “initially assessed by another outpatient phsyiotherapist…computer worker with a four to five year history of altered sensation in the left upper limb;including numbness, pins and needles and pain in the hand and thumb, and, pain around the lateral aspect of the elbow…gradually worsening…using his left hand less in everyday activities.”

By the by, this was session one, which we will call day one. Again, the body is a roadmap. Symptoms that are referred to the hand can come from anywhere that sends information to the hand. Let’s break it down in laymen’s terms. When you flip the switch on the lamp and the light doesn’t turn on, what’s the problem? First, the light may be burned out. This is akin to the muscles not working appropriately or a problem at the location of the visual or perceived problem…in this instance the hand. The problem could also be the power cord. This is similar to a problem coming from a nerve that travels from the hand up to the neck. Any of the nerves that supply the hand could be “frayed”, for lack of a better term. Finally, the cord could be unplugged. In this case, the electricity isn’t even making it to the power cord. This is similar to a problem with the neck. If the brain can’t send the signal appropriately to the power cord, then the hand won’t work correctly.

This is obviously becoming a problem for this particular patient, as he is slowly de-emphasizing the use of his left hand.

 

  1. “full active and passive range of motion. Left shoulder flexion produced pins and needles in the left hand”

When a patient raises his arm overhead, most people can see how the muscles work and that the shoulder joint must be moving somehow. What people don’t see is how this plays on the nerves of the body. When a patient reaches forward, this pulls on the nerves of the body and sometimes can increase a patient’s symptoms.

 

  1. “Session two (two weeks later): non-dermatomal distribution of hand symptoms…the presence of night pain that consistently disturbed the patient’s sleep”

Red flags. Think of the JAWS theme music when you here these words. Red Flags are BAAAD! Non-dermatomal patterns means that the symptoms don’t match the road map of the spine. If a problem is coming from one location, it would typically refer to one location in the hand. If it is coming from multiple locations, then it would refer to multiple locations in the hand. Ever heard of the phrase “Occam’s razor”? This means that the simplest solution is typically the correct solution. Two separate lesions in the spine occurring at the same time is not a very likely solution. This indicates that there could be a space occupying lesion (AKA SPINAL TUMOR!). Second, the patient is waking during the night due to symptoms. This is also a red flag for…CANCER!

This is two weeks later and the suspicion of non-mechanical pain (AKA spinal tumor) is introduced. This is where timeline starts to play a role between socialized medicine and US healthcare.

For those that don’t know, this topic is close to my heart, as I am currently working on a paper for submission regarding a similar topic.

 

  1. “After 10 repetitions full active ROM had been restored in all directions. ULTT was pain free and full ROM with both median and radial bias”

MDT is known as Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. The Mechanical portion of this means, “what happens to the patient when we move the patient?”

In this case, the patient’s mechanics (ability to move) improved in all directions. ULTT (upper limb tension tests: pulling on the nerve to test their irritability) had improved after performing retraction and extension. When we see that a patient is improving with a treatment, we first assume that whatever we did actually helped the patient. I mean why wouldn’t it? It’s not like we think that we are special, but we do our best to be objective and not bias the patient to say that this treatment made me better. If the patient improves, then The puzzle is solved. If the patient tells me that they improved, but actually didn’t, then I did a poor job of establishing patient alliance! There has to be openness between the patient and therapist. Some research actually shows that patients will tell the therapist what they want to hear instead of what is true. I hope that this doesn’t happen to me, but then I would be fooling myself. As a therapist, I can’t help you 100% if the patient is not 100% truthful.  Okay, now back to our regularly scheduled broadcasting.

 

  1. “Session Three (one week later)…reduced elbow pain during the day and no elbow pain at night, fewer pins and needles, but the numbness in his fingers was unchanged…(at the end of the session) Numbness in the hand remained unchanged”

At this point, we are at three weeks and the third session. Don’t get me wrong, I like this style of therapy in which the patient is given a homework assignment and then return to the clinic for the PT to problem-solve the symptoms. Our current system has the patient coming to therapy 2-3 times per week for 4 weeks. I’m sorry, but if we look at normal healing for most musculoskeletal issues, it is six weeks! Think about that. We know that it could take up to 6 weeks to treat an injury and you will be coming to therapy for up to 12 visits and still not enough time has passed in order for an injury to heal. We know this, but as I stated in previous blog posts, healthcare is big business.

The patient’s numbness is unchanged at the end of the session, but all else is better. At this point, the therapist has to start to think that the numbness is non-mechanical and start doing differential diagnosis internally as to why the numbness remains unchanged.

 

  1. “Session four (two weeks later)…’bad week’ as he (the patient) had intermittently increased left arm pain “after sneezing and coughing”…numbness was unchanged.”

We are now at 5 weeks and the patient is unchanged. One of the red flags that is in the research is no improvement following 30 days of treatment. At this point, medical assessments should be advised and the patient should be scheduled for that surgical consultation.

 

  1. “Session five (four days later)…’better’ after the previous session…ongoing numbness in his left fingers…an appointment was arranged with an orthopedic surgeon…requested that an MRI of the cervical spine (neck) to investigate the possibility of spinal canal/foraminal narrowing and to examine the possibility of a compressive lesion or space-occupying lesion”

We are now at 6 weeks. In America, this would be about 12-18 sessions instead of 5 sessions. We would still be at the same end-point, but the cost savings would equate to about $1,300 over the course of the episode. Healthcare is a business, so return on investment has to be looked at. We get reimbursed roughly 100$/session from Medicare. It makes sense that the cost of healthcare continues to increase when a patient is coming into therapy based on traditional treatment paradigms instead of current evidence or even best practice.

Now this patient is moved along in the healthcare system. Something to note is that the PT can request the MRI in order to look for foraminal narrowing (STENOSIS) or space occupying lesion (TUMOR).

 

9 “Session six (two weeks later)…symptoms were generally worse in the evening and better during the day…numbness and pins and needles in the hand were intermittent”

Two months out and the patient is waiting to see the surgeon and get the MRI. This is a downfall of the socialistic medicine. If this is something very serious, then the patient has waited 2 months for the MRI. Is there a right answer? I don’t know, but I know that our healthcare system is broken and a shift to a more conservative type of healthcare may be worth a shot.

 

  1. “surgeon’s clinic approximately three and a half weeks after his last physiotherapy session. MRI of neck and nerve conduction studies of the left arm were ordered…MRI four weeks later…”abnormality of the entire cervical cord”…solid, cystic mass within the cervical cord from C4-C6…excision of tumour approximately four weeks later”

This guy had a huge tumor. This accounts for symptoms extending in such a large location, as the tumor affects the nerve roots (think multiple electrical outlets) from varying locations. This would explain the widespread symptoms in the hand. Again, let’s look at the time table: we are now about 3 months out from session one and the patient is finally in surgery.  I have seen a similar presentation in practice a couple of times and not all were favorable outcomes. I say this from experience, as I have had two patients that died from a similar presentation, which was caught well before 3 months after the initial assessment. The patient in the case survived and his symptoms improved after the surgery.

  1. “The wait to see the surgeon was a reflection of the large caseload within the orthopaedic surgeons’s outpatient clinic. The wait for the initial MRI was due to the prioritization system used by the medical imaging department, to manage demand for so called ‘non-urgent musculoskeletal’ MRI’s”

When everyone has the same insurance, everyone has the same access to healthcare. When everyone has the same access, there are not enough practitioners to go around and systems need to be developed to handle the overload of patients coming into the health care system. We are starting to see this impact of “Obamacare”. There are so many more patients coming into the system the past two years that it is not uncommon to have a 2 week wait to see the therapist for the initial evaluation.

MORAL: When everyone has the same right to health care, then no one has the same freedoms as they did previously, unless they choose to pay a portion of their healthcare out of pocket. This is doing what’s best for society at the cost of the individual. More people will be insured and have access to treatment. If I am the person that has a spinal tumor though and has to wait for 3 months for treatment…I don’t think that I am agreeable to this type of system.

Let me know what you think? Are you in a country with free healthcare, how does it affect you personally?

 Excerpts taken from:

 

Schoch P. Cervical spine tumor presenting as unilateral upper limb symptoms. IJMDT. 2009;4(3):24-29.

For more information or to receive an MDT evaluation from a credentialed therapist, I can be found at:

Functional Therapy and Rehabilitation

903 N 129th Infantry Dr

Joliet Il 

815-483-2440

FORGHETABOUTIT!

FORGHETABOUTIT!

 

Stachura J. The testing of frontal plane movements in the loaded position in the absence of a lateral shift-A case study. International Journal of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. 2009;4(3):17-23.

 

  1. “It is estimated that 80% of the adult population will experience low back pain at some time during their life. During a typical year, 40% of adults will experience back pain.”

I realize that this statistic gets thrown around so often, but it is only because 8/10 people will have the pleasure of being a back pain statistic. Very few people will live their life without going through an episode of back pain. Like Lavar Burton would say…”The more you know”.

 

  1. “It has been reported that up to 90% of patients referred for low back pain cannot be given a specific anatomical diagnosis”

Think about this. Most people that I see just want to be educated. How would you feel about going to your doctor to better understand what your problem is and being told you have back pain. DUH! “I came to the office to tell you that I have back pain and all you can tell me is what I told you!”. That is the best we can do in most situations. Everyone wants to know about the exploding disc or the pulled muscle or the DUM DUM DUM…ARTHRITIS! Typically there is not one cookie cutter answer to your pain and 9/10 times we can not state with certainty what is the problem tissue causing pain. 

  1. “The MDT model involves a movement examination in which single and repeated end range movements are performed and the patient’s response to these movements is assessed.”

In order to figure out how your symptoms respond and to better understand your symptoms, you will have to be moved while in our presence. This statement above does a good job of explaining MDT, AKA the McKenzie Method. You will be moved, not once, but tens to hundreds of times in order to determine what makes you better and what makes you worse. Once this is figured out, the rest is easy. Avoid what makes you worse and continue what makes you better. I spent almost $80K to learn this! It’s a little more complicated than this, but not much, which has been part of the stigma against this method: “It’s too easy”. Look, would you rather I looked very pensive and gave you 20 exercises and treated you for months on end, or would you rather I smiled with the thought that “I got this!” and then only treated you for 6-8 sessions? 

  1. “When a specific movement or combination of movements results in the patient’s symptoms being centralized, reduced or abolished, it is said that this is the directional preference of movement for the patient. If a directional preference is found, this determines the treatment intervention strategy…allows the MDT trained practitioner to make a provisional classification…then drives the principle of management.”

I wrote all of this out because I can’t stress the importance of all of the above. We have a ton of research since Donelson came out the term directional preference over 20 years ago. To make this very simplistic, many back pains are like a locked door. When we find the one movement that makes your pain better, it is like the key to open the door. Many patients, about 49%-64%, with back pain can be unlocked with the right key. If the therapist is trained to find the key, then it’s like solving a rubix cube. If a therapist doesn’t even understand the basic principle of directional preference, there will be a lot of attempts to open the door with CORE TRAINING (buzz word), massage, manipulation, rest and relaxation and heat or ultrasound. Not many of these have great evidence (albeit manipulation is growing in the research) of turning off back pain.

  1. “ A lateral shift was not detectable with visual inspection”

Let’s start with “lateral shift” and what it is vs. isn’t, because not every therapist can agree on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gvk4TGw4ba8 I have absolutely no problem advertising for someone else if it also aids in educating the patients that I treat. A lateral shift literally means that the patient, when attempting to stand upright and straight, leans to one side or another due to pain and is unable to attain an upright position.

FUNNY STORY: I had a patient years ago that walked in with a lateral shift. There are some rules to determine whether or not the person’s crooked posture is relevant to the symptoms, but as a young know-it-all, I knew that it had to be relevant. Anyway, I treated this shift for over 40 minutes trying to get this person to walk straight and his symptoms weren’t changing nor was his posture improving. I called his wife back to the clinic and asked her to watch him walk. I didn’t tell her what I was looking for and just asked “what’s the most obvious thing that you see”. She said “he looks like he always looks like that” WHAT?! “Look at the guy…he’s crooked”. She followed with, “now that you mention it, he is crooked, but he’s always been that way.” I essentially let my eagerness to play the hero override the basic premise of ensuring that his being crooked actually has something to do with his symptoms. I was WRONG! Note this date, because I don’t say it often. Anyway’s, a few press-ups (look up a video of repeated extension in lying) and this crooked patient was pain-free, but still crooked.

  1. “Single movements were tested…demonstrated a major loss of lumbar flexion, moderate loss of lumbar extension, and a minimal loss of side gliding”

What this means is that the patient was unable to bend forward, had much difficulty bending backwards and sidegliding was not blocked much. Most patients don’t know what side gliding is, and don’t feel bad because many PT’s don’t know it either. This is a movement of shifting the hips like 1. You are holding a baby on your hips or 2. You are trying to hip check someone into the glass. This movement is important because it is more likely to test the problem area than just sideways bending. If your therapist has you bend sideways instead of side gliding, try your best to educate the therapist (You heard right!) and if the PT still doesn’t understand…walk out.

  1. “ A stud by Feinberg on 2320 patients with low back pain demonstrated that the most common site of disc pathology was the L4-L5 and L5-S1 level in combination followed by L5-S1 alone. Side glide in standing has been demonstrated to better isolate the lower lumbar segments than side bending”

Again, this relates to the above statement. Most people have back pain originating from the bottom two segments of the low back. Think about it, the lowest portions of the spine have to carry more weight than any other portions of the spine. It makes sense that they will be screaming for help at some point. To the point, side gliding affects these two segments moreso than sidways bending affects the bottom segments. Follow me for a second. Ninety-five percent of problems happen at these segments. If I am not testing the segments, then what am I doing?! It’s akin to me asking you move your arm in order to determine what’s wrong with your ankle. I understand that it’s an extreme example, but the theory is still the same. If you have a back problem that looks and smells like it could be coming from the lowest segments, we should be looking at the lowest segments in the best way possible. You will know more about this than most new graduates after reading just this segment of the blog. 

  1. “While there is no evidence to support the following, this author believes that the loaded position (standing) is more functional and therefore, should be fully tested before testing unloaded (lying) positions.”

This guy just took a huge leap. Okay, when practicing MDT it is taught, no drilled into us, that we should always follow the form. The author of this study is no longer following the form. That is not a bad thing. This guy is able to give a rationale for why we test some things in standing and some things in lying. The biggest picture item to understand about this method is that we will continue testing you to determine what helps you compared to what hurts you. For me and many other practitioners, our primary goal is to understand how your symptoms respond to certain movements. When we see patterns or certain “phenomenon” after moving you, we can start to play your symptoms like a fiddle. This means that we should be able to accurately predict what will make you worse and better. I personally like to test this to see if I am right. It will put the patient through a little more symptoms than they have to be, but so be it. (I really am a nice guy though). From my experience with patients, therapists aren’t doing this and the patient’s may never experience a cause and effect moment during the entire therapy episode, or even worse, traditional therapy may create a cause-effect relationship in a negative way and actually make the patient worse. It’s not the patient’s fault.

FINAL STORY: I had a patient back in 2009 that came walking into the clinic on crutches. Her diagnosis was sciatica and I couldn’t figure out why the crutches? I asked and she said that she walked in to a local clinic and needed crutches in order to leave the clinic. The PT was performing hamstring stretches. RANT: I hate seeing the traditional picture of the therapist in the Polo shirt stretching a patient’s hamstring. I never look that good stretching a patient! END RANT. The patient in question responded rapidly (good book: Rapidly Reversible Back Pain by Dr. Ron Donelson) to lumbar extension and not only did she not need crutches after the first session, but she had no pain whatsoever. Forghettaboutit!

 

MORAL: Not all therapists have the same knowledge even though we all have the same baseline education. Educate yourself in order to be better informed when going to see your healthcare practitioner.

If you are experiencing back pain or know someone that would benefit from an evaluation to determine how rapidly the symptoms can be resolved give them my name. I can be found at

Functional Therapy and Rehabilitation

Now part of the Goodlife family

903 N Infantry Dr

Joliet Il

60435

815-483-2440

PHYSICAL THERAPY: The art is old, but the science is young.

By Vince Gutierrez PT, cert. MDT

 

Excerpts taken from the following article:

Thackeray A, Fritz JM, Childs JD, Brennan GP. The Effectiveness of Mechanical Traction Among Subgroups of Patients With Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Randomized Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(3):144-154

 

  1. “The cost of management for low back pain (LBP) in the United States is estimated at nearly $86 billion annually.”

Put these numbers in perspective. http://www.usdebtclock.org/state-debt-clocks/state-of-illinois-debt-clock.html. If we can come up with a better way in which to treat this epidemic, then we can decrease more than half of the debt from my home state. Performed year to year and we can theoretically reduced the debt load of each state within 100 years. I know that it sounds like it will take a long time, but so far there aren’t any better ideas. If nothing else, this number is humongous. It accounts for about 3% of all healthcare expenses.

 

  1. “Two commonly used interventions for these patients include an extension-oriented treatment approach (EOTA) and mechanical traction. The EOTA was popularized by the McKenzie examination and treatment system”

First there is a lot to say about these two sentences. One reason that MDT is so closely associated to extension based exercises is because of research articles such as this. This is not the case. The McKenzie examination and treatment system, AKA MDT, is a systematic assessment used to assess patient’s symptoms in order to classify the patient and lead to subsequent treatment. There are a lot of patients that respond to extension, but extension is not MDT. This has to be cleared up more because of a personal problem with patients being treated by a therapist that says “I use McKenzie in my treatment”, when actually the therapist has no more training than someone that has read this blog.

Next, we have to define EOTA. This basically means press-ups or cobra poses in yoga. This could also mean just standing up and leaning against a countertop with your butt pressed against the countertop for support. From this point, lean backwards as far as you can. One thing that separates MDT from EOTA is that MDT stresses mid-range (small stretch) to end-range (big stretch) with overpressure if needed.

Big point is this: MCKENZIE TREATMENT INCLUDES EXTENSION, BUT EXTENSION IS NOT MCKENZIE TREATMENT.

 

  1. “Many clinicians also report the use of traction for patients with low back and leg pain”

Some people may remember traction from old school hospital shows that has a person in a body cast with the leg suspended in the air with a weight pulling on the leg. The main thing to know is that traction is a shortened form of “DIStraction”, which means to pull apart. For low back pain, this hasn’t been used as much in the 2000’s as it has prior to this century. Previous research (performed by the same people that did this study) found that only a small percentage of people will be a good responder to traction. These people tend to have two characteristics, which will be talked about in a later point.

 

  1. “Experts generally agree that traction is most appropriate for patients with peripheral symptoms and signs of neurological compromise, for whom centralization of symptoms is a treatment goal”

“Peripheral symptoms” mean that the symptoms are in the periphery (think peripheral vision being around the outside of the eye), peripheral symptoms are around the outer limbs of the body. Centralization is moving the symptoms from the periphery to a more central location, think move the symptoms from the outer limb to the spine. [As an aside: if you see my picture, you can see that I have a two year old. She is actively pulling my arm at this time, so if I sound scatter brained, I blame her.]

 

  1. The patients that demonstrate improvement with traction in a previous study, “demonstrated at least 1 of the following: peripheralization of symptoms when moving into lumbar extension or a positive crossed straight leg raise”

Every profession has its own language. When I try to read legal documents, I fall asleep. When someone else tries to read medical documents, it can be overwhelming or intimidating. A crossed straight leg raise simply means the following: crossed (opposite leg of the leg that is having pain/numbness/tingling), straight leg (well, this one is kind of self explanatory, but keeping the leg straight), and raise (again self explanatory, but raising the leg while lying on your back).

 

  1. “This was a …longitudinal randomized trial”.

This means that the study was performed over the course of time from a start point and continued until some point in the future. Randomized means that the subjects in the study (think guinea pig) were randomly placed into one of two groups. This is like when in school and the teacher has to create groups. One of the ways to try to make the teams fair is to draw from a hat. (Another aside: In PT school there was a partner that I loved to work with because our styles totally complemented each other. She was very organized and I was [am] very much the opposite. Let’s just call her M FN Jones. Okay, she carried the team, but I can hold my own on the workload portion. Anyway, the teacher decided to pull our names from a hat on the last project after 3 years of having been allowed to work together (we partnered on almost everything we did up until that point). Needless to say, the teacher pulled our names out as the first group.) The point of that is we were randomly assigned to be in a group, which we would’ve picked in the first place…Moving on.

 

  1. Inclusion criteria is as follows: “between the ages of 18 and 60 years, presented with leg pain distal [further down the leg] to the buttock and signs of nerve root compression (positive straight leg raise [self-explanatory] or diminished dermatomes [loss of sensation at certain points in the leg], myotomes [specific weakness in the leg] or reflex…and reported moderate disability as indicated by an Oswestry Disability Index score of 20 or greater”

Here we go. Inclusion criteria means that only people that meet the specific requirements are allowed into the study. You would have to meet all of the above requirements in order to compare your self with the people in the study. The therapist that you are seeing should attempt to use research that best matches your presentation to that of what was read. For instance, it doesn’t make sense to use this article for someone that only has back pain. This article is not written for that type of patient.

Next, myotomes and dermatomes. I do a ton of patient education in the clinic. One thing to understand is that you are not special! Well, you may be special, but we are all alike in some aspects. Everyone has a spine (at least everyone that I treat, so as not offended those spineless people). The spine acts like a road map. Meaning if you have a nerve problem at L4-L5 or L5-S1 (think the lowest portion of your back), then your symptoms would travel down to the big toe or to the outer border/bottom of the foot. The reason why I use these points specifically is that about 95% of back problems come from these levels. These nerves can affect the knee jerk reflex or the foot jerk reflex (this reflex is less sexy, so gets less airtime on hospital shows).

If you have been to a therapist or doctor, I am sure that you were told to show up 15 minutes early to fill out paperwork. The Oswestry Disability Index is typically one of those paperworks that you have to fill out. It essentially gives us a starting point from which to judge how the symptoms affect your everyday life. The higher the score, the worse you are doing.

  1. “A series of active extension-oriented exercises were performed and progressed…(patients) were instructed to discontinue any activities and to avoid positions that could cause their symptoms to peripheralized or increase in intensity, and were encouraged to stay active.”

Extension oriented exercises are those that I described earlier: the cobra pose and back bending, in addition to prone lying (lying on your belly) and prone on elbows (propped up on your elbows like a kid watching t.v.). It sounds funny that lying on your belly is considered exercise, but if I can charge for it, then it must be exercise. Just kidding. People that lose the ability to bend backwards may be able to start with the lowest level of extension, which in this case is simply prone lying. This is progressed until the patient can perform repeated extension in standing (increasing the lordosis [hollow] in the lower part of the spine.

Participants were instructed to not make themselves any worse. This seems like common sense, but if the person doesn’t understand centralization and peripheralization, this request may not be followed, as sometimes the back pain is more intense compared to the leg symptoms experienced prior to performing extension based movements. The patient must understand that leg symptoms = bad and back symptoms = better.

  1. “The traction protocol was designed with guidance from expert clinicans who use traction frequently and was aimed at a population with lumbar radicular pain consistent with a disc herniation”

This one puzzles me as a clinician. What this says is: “we didn’t really have a good place to start, based on research, so we just called some people that use this treatment to see what they do”. This is the whole “art of science”, in that traction is a traditional based exercise, but its artsy because there’s not much science showing it works.

  1. “Treatments were provided by a licensed physical therapist trained in all study procedures during a 90-minute training session”

Obviously, the people doing the study are well respected and I have met 2 of them. It sounds more glamorous than it actually was-more of a handshake really-but it’s true. That’s my way of saying that these are also considered the “great gurus” of our profession. Now, after saying that…90 minutes?! Really? This is another part that I am frustrated with MDT being used as background information of this study. MDT trained therapists undergo over 80 hours of coursework before sitting for a test in order to be considered “minimally competent”. To say that the researchers learned the procedures in 90 minutes and then compare this to MDT is a travesty. “And that’s all I got to say about that.” A la Mr. Gump.

  1. “The mean +- SD number of treatment sessions was 10.1+- 2.7, with no difference between group.”

What this means is that the people in the study were seen for anywhere from 7-13 visits. Think about that. If you are going to a therapist for more than 13 visits and there has been no effect for back pain, maybe it’s not working.

  1. “…4 participants assigned to EOTA (switched to traction).”

Extension is not for everyone. If a treatment isn’t working or you are getting worse from extension (backward type movements), you should probably switch treatments or go somewhere else if the healthcare practitioner is not comfortable moving you in a way that doesn’t make you worse. There’s a couple of sayings that come to mind in this situation. When I was first learning MDT, many “experienced” therapists told me that to an MDT practitioner “everything looks like a nail, because all you have is a hammer”. This couldn’t be further from the truth and the statement only demonstrates the healthcare practitioner’s ignorance. Don’t get me wrong, I forgive ignorance, but not after having informed you of the total wrongness of the statement. Let’s also talk about experience for a second. I take many students, as I am a credentialed clinical instructor. By the time the student is done with the clinical, I hope for two things: one that he/she is a better clinician walking out compared to walking in and two that the student never becomes a practitioner of 20 years of work with only one year of experience as opposed to 20 years of experience. Moving on, the second saying that comes to mind is “trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.” There are MDT therapists that continue to do this, and the only reason that I know this is because it is still talked about at both courses and conventions. If you have a therapist trying to shove you into a hole you don’t belong in…find another one. Holes are uncomfortable and borderline scary. When you feel this with your healthcare practitioner, you’ll know.

  1. “In other words, matching traction treatment to those patients positive on the subgrouping criteria did not result in greater improvement in pain or disability.”

A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, there was these researchers that found that a specific group of patients responded better to traction than others. One of the researchers that did the initial study was also an author on the current study. I am impressed when an author can publish a negative (the treatment doesn’t work) study. First, there is a publication bias against this type of study because it is also not as sexy as a study that cures back pain. Second though, this author states that there is a subgroup of patients that can be helped by traction and then later states that maybe there isn’t a subgroup.

  1. “This is consistent with a Cochrane review by Wegner et al that identifies low-to moderate-quality evidence that lumbar traction has little or no impact on disability and pain” and “For patients who are unresponsive to other treatments, using traction to determine if centralization can be achieved may be a reasonable approach, particularly when many medical alternatives include more costly interventions such as injections and surgery.”

Okay, this was a mouthful (imagine typing it all!). The Cochrane review just says that there is a lot of evidence showing that there is moderate evidence that it doesn’t help. Did you get that? We can state, with moderate certainty, that you shouldn’t get have this done to you. This is still prescribed on many physician’s scripts and performed by many therapists.   If your therapist is using this as the go to, then you are no longer ignorant and “Here’s your sign”.

The second aspect of this is more appealing to me and I appreciate the authors’ honesty in writing this. What it essentially says is that if you are a surgical candidate, meaning surgery is the only option, then the kitchen sink should be thrown at you in order to try to fix your problem. If the end result is laying you on a table and cutting you open, either removing a piece of your spine or placing rods and screws in your body, then I am all for traction!

 

In the end, you are a little more educated than you were after reading all of this. I am much more tired after typing all of this. We will all be better off for it in the long run.

Until next time.

If you have back pain, or you know someone that would benefit from an assessment, please pass this information on to them. 

Functional Therapy and Rehabilitation

903 N Infantry Dr. 

Suite 500

815-483-2440